Israeli Style: Wiping Out Entire Families in Gaza

 The sharp escalation in Israel’s targeting of civilians in the Gaza Strip is deeply alarming. Entire families, including women and children, are being killed at horrific rates, as the international community fails to stop the nearly 19-month-long genocide.

While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied to the media that Israel was targeting civilians, military aircraft continued to carry out airstrikes that deliberately killed women and children in the Gaza Strip. These horrific crimes are no longer the exception to the rule; rather, the recurring pattern of such atrocities demonstrates a systematic Israeli policy defying all international laws and norms.

In just one week — between 20 and 26 April — Israel killed 345 Palestinians and injured 770 others, according to field data indicating that at least 94% of the victims were civilians. Children (51%), women (16%), and the elderly (8%) together accounted for 75% of those killed. Among the remaining victims (adult males), field verification confirmed that at least 63 of 81 worked in civilian jobs or independent professions unrelated to any militant or organizational activity, further reinforcing the predominantly civilian nature of the casualties.

There is no evidence indicating that the adult male victims, for whom detailed data was unavailable at the time of this publication, were involved in hostilities or associated with militant activities. Israel has provided no credible proof to the contrary. As such, the general legal presumption of the victims’ civilian status applies in this situation, granting those targeted full protection under international humanitarian law, with the burden on Israel to prove otherwise.

The unprecedented rise in civilian casualties coincides with Netanyahu’s continued false statements denying the targeting of civilians, which is a blatant attempt to mislead international public opinion and cover up Israeli crimes on the ground. Meanwhile, extensive field evidence, live testimonies, photographs, and direct documentation all confirm that womenand children make up the largest proportion of victims, and that the enclave’s remaining buildings, infrastructure, and shelters are being systematically and intensively bombarded. The intention of the ongoing targeting is unquestionably to kill civilians and destroy the foundations of Palestinian life, accelerating their gradual uprooting from their land.

Over the past few weeks, Euro-Med Monitor’s field team has documented repeated instances of entire families being wiped out, as well as the deliberate targeting of specific families in a pattern suggesting a clear intent to annihilate them. The Israeli government’s continued fostering of false narratives, alongside the escalation of these crimes, reaffirms its systematic policy of covering up violations and protecting perpetrators. Israel and its allies are operating within a framework of complete impunity aimed at undermining justice, and are inadvertently revealing to the world the biased foundations of international law.

Civilian lives, including those of children and women, are not collateral damage to be overlooked; these are real people with personal stories, deliberately and systematically killed without the Israeli acknowledgement of any legal or even moral obligations. Protecting civilian lives and holding those responsible accountable is a legal and moral duty the international community must not evade.

Israeli aircraft bombed a house in Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip, on 28 April at dawn. The strike killed 12 members of the Kaware’ family, including Zainab al-Majayda and her six children. One of al-Majayda’s brothers had been killed by Israel three months earlier.

The Israeli army has recently intensified its use of suicide drones to target the tents and homes of displaced people. These drones are equipped with advanced surveillance cameras and guidance systems, enabling the precise, real-time tracking of targets. This technology, which allows operators to monitor a target up until the last moment and decide whether to strike or refrain, eliminates any margin for error or randomness. It confirms that this type of targeting is being carried out knowingly and deliberately, in clear violation of the rules for civilian protection under international humanitarian law.

In another recent attack, the Israeli army used a suicide drone to target a tent housing displaced people in the al-Mawasi area of Khan Yunis at approximately 1:50 a.m. on Friday 25 April. The attack wiped out an entire family: Ibrahim Khalil Abu Taima (33), his pregnant wife, Hanadi Shaaban Abu Taima (29), and the couple’s three children, Samira (9), Azem (6), and Raafat (4). On the evening of the same day, Israeli jets bombed the home of the Al-Amour family, nearly wiping them out entirely. The couple and their nine children—including three boys and four girls—were killed, with only one child surviving the massacre.

Following the documentation of several attacks by this type of drone, it has become clear that most of the victims have been children, women, and unarmed civilians. This further demonstrates that Israel is deliberately targeting and killing Palestinian civilians en masse as part of the ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip.

Israel’s deliberate targeting of simple shelters—including makeshift tents and half-destroyed homes—with heavy bombs or suicide drones and without any justified military necessity, reveals a systematic policy aimed at causing the highest possible number of civilian casualties and instilling terror among the Palestinian population. These actions are explicitly prohibited under international law.

Most of Israel’s attacks, which strike purely civilian sites, are not followed by any official attempt to justify the targeting. In some cases, Israeli military sources will claim a member of an armed Palestinian faction was the target. Such flimsy pretexts neither justify the enormous number of civilian deaths nor reflect the scale of the human and material losses caused by theongoing attacks, however.

Israel routinely repeats the same claim whenever international public opinion rises against its crimes, asserting it was targeting “militants” to justify its attacks on civilians without providing concrete, verifiable evidence or allowing any independent party to verify these claims.

Furthermore, the internal investigations Israel announces after committing certain crimes have lacked independence and seriousness. These investigations are obviously not intended to hold perpetrators accountable or achieve justice, and serve mainly to provide formal cover for the soldiers and officers involved. In the rare instances where punitive measures are taken, they are limited to minor administrative actions that in no way reflect the gravity of the crimes committed or the severity of the violations.

Israel’s claims, in and of themselves, do not absolve it of its responsibilities under international law, including the duty to conduct effective investigations, hold perpetrators accountable, and provide redress to victims. Euro-Med Monitor strongly condemns the automatic acceptance of unsubstantiated Israeli allegations, as silent complicity effectively grants Israel a license to continue targeting civilians under a false legal cover, thus undermining the substance and effectiveness of the international legal system.

Even if a combatant were assumed to be present or passing through an area, this would not justify these brutal massacres nor absolve Israel of its obligations under international law and international humanitarian law. Israel remains fully bound to uphold the principles of humanity, distinction, military necessity, proportionality, and precaution. To ensure the minimum possible loss of civilian life and injury, these obligations must be respected during the planning and execution of any military operation, including taking precautions in the choice of methods and means of warfare, without exception.

Israeli massacres against Palestinians have become a familiar sight, met with near-total silence despite the genocide essentially being livestreamed across the globe. It’s as if the killing of Palestinian civilians—openly committed by Israel and its allies without fear of legal or moral consequences—has become an implicitly accepted reality within the international system.

International indifference to this pattern of crimes is not merely a moral failure but a grave breach of the legal obligations of states and the international community. It transforms the mass killing of Palestinians from criminal acts into policies carried out openly before the entire world. Silence in the face of these crimes constitutes a clear failure to fulfil the legal duty to prevent genocide and punish its perpetrators, as mandated by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

The Israeli killing methodology reflects a clear policy aimed at eliminating Palestinian civilians across the Gaza Strip, spreading panic, depriving them of shelter or stability, forcing repeated displacements, and subjecting them to deadly living conditions. All of this is compounded by ongoing Israeli bombardment across the Strip, including attacks on areas designated as humanitarian zones, and the targeting of shelters, even those located within UNRWA facilities.

All states, individually and collectively, must fulfill their legal responsibilities by taking urgent action to stop the genocide in the Gaza Strip, through implementing effective measures to protect Palestinian civilians, ensuring Israel’s compliance with international law and the decisions of the International Court of Justice; and holding Israel accountable for its crimes against the Palestinians. The International Criminal Court must reissue arrest warrants for the Israeli Prime Minister and Minister of Defence at the earliest opportunity, in accordance with the principle that there is no immunity for international crimes.

The international community must also impose economic, diplomatic, and military sanctions on Israel for its systematic and grave violations of international law. These sanctions should include an arms embargo; an end to all political, financial, and military support; freezing the assets of officials involved in crimes against Palestinians; imposing travel bans; and suspending trade privileges and bilateral agreements that provide Israel with economic benefits that enable its continued crimes.

Continue reading
Israel Fears Hamas Ambushes in Gaza

The Palestinian resistance has begun to translate into reality the warnings issued by the Israeli occupation army, a few days ago, of the possible escalation of operations against its forces inside the Gaza Strip, according to military expert Major-General Fayez al-Duwairi.

Al-Duwairi explained on Al Jazeera the military operations in al-Tuffah area, east of Gaza City, the “Breaking the Sword” ambush east of Beit Hanoun, followed by another ambush in the same location falls within the context of these warnings.

He said the resistance is still able to survive because of the method of battle it is waging and adapting to the movements of the Israeli army. He noted the resistance forces “are not operationally offensive, but rather tactically offensive…”

Al-Duwairi’s statement comes after the Hamas al-Qassam Brigades, announced, Sunday, it detonated an anti-personnel bomb targeting a number of Israeli soldiers, confirming they were killed and wounded east of the al-Tuffah neighborhood.

As the Qassam Brigades announced the targeting of an Israeli Merkava 4 tank with an Al-Yassin 105 missile east of Tuffah, the Al-Quds Brigades of Islamic Jihad targeted a military barracks and a number of Israeli soldiers in a house with a guided missile.

The military expert emphasized the resistance factions maintain a high level of preparedness, “albeit varying from one battalion to another,” in his comment on the intensification of operations against the Israeli army.

According to Al-Duwairi, the new Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir came up with exaggerated expectations and an approximation of “zero losses,” based on the deployment of forces in the buffer zone and then a cautious and gradual advance under intense fire.

But, the resistance began targeting Israeli forces and vehicles with ambushes and anti-personnel and anti-tank missiles as the Israeli army began to deepen its incursion into built-up areas and their rubble.

A few days ago, the Israeli Walla news website quoted military sources as saying the Israeli army reinforced its defenses at its military positions in the area.

According to these sources, the army warns of a possible escalation of Hamas operations against its forces, as the movement’s militants are expected to launch guerrilla-style operations.

The Israeli army estimates, according to Walla, that Hamas is likely to launch targeted sniper attacks, ambushes, and other complex operations.

Continue reading
‘Not A Single Mosque Remains Standing’

Not a single historic mosque in Gaza remains untouched following months of relentless Israeli bombardment, according to British archaeologist Claudine Dauphin.

“Every historic mosque in Gaza has been either partially or completely destroyed,” said Dauphin, who is affiliated with several archaeological missions in the region.

Among the most significant losses are the Omari Mosque and the KatibWilaya Mosque, both located in the Zaytun quarter of Gaza’s Old City. The KatibWilaya Mosque was originally constructed with funding from Ahmad Bey, the province’s chief secretary (katibwilaya) in 1586 during the Ottoman period. 

Its minaret once stood beside the bell tower of the Church of St. Procopius, symbolizing centuries of Muslim-Christian coexistence in Gaza—a connection also evident in the mosaic floors of the nearby Jabaliya Church.

“In the Shuja’iyya quarter, the Mamluk-era Zafardamri Mosque, built in 1360, was deliberately leveled in an airstrike,” Dauphin added. “The Mahkama Mosque, also Mamluk in origin, was similarly destroyed during the 2014 assault and again in the current offensive.”

The destruction extended beyond Mamluk and Ottoman heritage. The Othman Bin Qashqar Mosque was struck during an air raid in December 2023, and the Sayyid Hashim Mosque, built in Ottoman style and covering 2,400 square meters, was razed in the Daraj quarter.

Shrines, too, have been systematically targeted. The shrine of the Prophet Yusuf near Jabaliya, destroyed in 2014, was followed by widespread losses since October 2023. 

Among the shrines destroyed are the Al Husseini, Abu Al Azim, Ali Abu Al Kass, and Ali ibn Marwan shrines in Gaza City, as well as the Sheikh ‘Ali Al Mintar and Shaykh Radwan shrines on Tel Al-Mintar. Numerous other maqamat (shrines) in Al Shaykh ‘Ajlun were also obliterated.

Of special cultural and interfaith significance was the shrine of Al Khidr in Rafah, which held particular meaning for Christians who believed it housed the tomb of St. Hilarion, founder of Palestinian monasticism.

Modern mosques, built after the Ottoman period, were not spared. According to a January 2024 report by the Palestinian Ministry of Awqaf and Religious Affairs, at least 1,000 of the 1,200 modern mosques in the Gaza Strip have been partially or entirely destroyed.

“Among the losses in Gaza City are the Ali Ibn Marwan, Shaikh Zakaria, Al Mughrabi, and Sett Ruqayya mosques,” Dauphin noted.

Cultural and educational institutions were also hit. The Al Kamiliya Madrasa, built in 1237 by Ayyubid Sultan Al Kamil and featuring a central courtyard and two floors, was the last historic madrasa still standing in Gaza before it was destroyed. It had served both as a Quranic school and a shelter for poor students and travelers until 1930.

Cemeteries have not been spared either. At least 16 Muslim cemeteries across the Gaza Strip have been damaged or destroyed since October 2023. Among them is the Beit Hanoun Cemetery near Khan Yunis, which was reportedly excavated by Israeli forces. 

The Israeli military claimed they were searching for a Hamas tunnel or hostages, but provided no evidence, and independent verification of the alleged tunnel has not been possible.

“These sacred spaces, mosques, shrines, schools, and cemeteries, are not only part of Gaza’s cultural fabric,” Dauphin said. “Their destruction represents a profound loss of historical heritage, not just for Palestinians but for humanity.”

This report was written by Saeb Al Rawashdeh for The Jordan Times

Continue reading
Trump’s War in The Red Sea

Dr Khairi Janbek

The US foreign policy in the Red Sea today is characterized by a robust military response to Houthi threats, aiming to protect critical maritime trade routes and assert influence in a geopolitical strategic area. While these military operations garnered international support, the ongoing conflict underscores the complexities and challenges of Middle East interventions.

The US military’s increased involvement in the Red Sea, including the deployment of two aircraft carriers, signals a commitment to ensuring freedom of navigation and countering the Iranians in the region. However, the present ongoing escalation also risks entangling the US in a prolonged conflict.

This is reminiscent of past Middle East engagements which the Americans should be well-aware of, and may put additional strain on the US military resources amid other pressing global priorities if faces.

That said, the present military strikes on Yemen are not just about the Houthis. They are also widely seen as demonstration of US strength towards the group’s main backer: Iran.

The Washington administration is currently locked in a series of negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear programme and Trump has not ruled out military action if those talks fail, yet, it is possible still, that the US, and judging by recent history, the Americans may change their mind and everything is put on hold yet again.

But we need to wait and see! The US has already moved its patriot and THAAD missiles from Asia to the Middle East, and only in the first month of the preparedness campaign, $200 million of ammunition has been used and this is making military officials greatly concerned about the impact on stocks the US Navy might use in the event of a Chinese attack on Taiwan.

At the same time, there are various Yemeni groups opposed to the Houthis with regional backing, and dare one say with some international backing, reportedly considering taking advantage of the situation to launch a ground campaign to oust the Houthis once and for all, but Washington is yet to make a decision on whether to back such operations or not.

Most analysts and officials say that, American troops participating in any ground operations in Yemen is highly unlikely, moreover, even more limited support for ground operations would still be another case of the US backing armed groups in a messy middle Eastern war; exactly the sort of situation Trump blasted previous administrations for falling into.

Dr Janbek is a Jordanian analyst based in Paris, France.

Continue reading